A few weeks ago, we read interesting news in the blog titled, \u201cTeresa, de la rueca a la pluma\u201d (Teresa: from the spinning wheel to the pen), written by Mar\u00eda Jos\u00e9 P\u00e9rez, Discalced Carmelite from Pu\u00e7ol, Valencia (Spain):<\/p>\n
\u201cLast June 6th, on the occasion of the anniversary of the birth of Father Graci\u00e1n, we once again shared on our social networks an entry in this blog in which we questioned, in a rational way, the commentary of the Prado Museum regarding one of his works. We refer to the October 2016 publication titled, \u2018Jerome Graci\u00e1n in the Prado Museum?\u2019<\/p>\n
\u201cWe understood that one of the figures in the painting by Benito Mercad\u00e9 y F\u00e1bregas, for historical reasons, could not be Father Jerome Graci\u00e1n, as stated in the information about the work of art provided in the Museum\u2019s website, but instead was Father \u00c1ngel de Salazar. To our surprise, early the next day we received a tweet from the national gallery announcing the correction:<\/p>\n
\u201c\u2018Good morning. Thank you very much for the post. We have modified the description of the work of art. Once updated, the text will read as follows: \u201cSaint Teresa of Jesus (1515-1582) gives an account of her reform to Father \u00c1ngel de Salazar (c. 1518 \u2013 c. 1596), provincial of the Order of Carmel.<\/p>\n
\u2018\u2014Prado Museum (@museodelprado) June 7, 2018\u2019<\/p>\n
\u201cWe are very happy that our blog influences such a prestigious institution, and we hold that we are happy to have contributed to the improvement of the information that is offered on its magnificent website.\u201d<\/p>\n